Data processing system adapted to integrating non-homogeneous processes

ABSTRACT

A data processing system comprises at least one resource manager (RM) for managing changes to respective system resources in accordance to a commit/backout protocol, and a resource manager coordinator (RMC) for coordinating the commit/backout activities of the at least one resource manager. A process resource manager (ERM) is provided, coordinated by the resource manager coordinator according to the commit/backout protocol, for managing the execution of non-compliant processes not complying with the commit/backout protocol. The process resource manager automatically determines, upon receipt of a backout request, a sequence of compensation actions to be performed to backout actions performed during the execution of the secondary non-compliant processes, and managing the execution of said compensation actions.

TECHNICAL FIELD

The present invention relates generally to data processing systems, andmore specifically to data processing systems in which processes runningin the system need to be coordinated according to a commit/backoutprotocol, such as transaction processing systems. In particular, theinvention concerns a data processing system adapted to integratingnon-homogeneous processes, i.e., processes compliant to a commit/backoutprotocol and processes non compliant to such a protocol.

BACKGROUND ART

Introducing new applications (such as programs, transactions, classes,objects or methods) in an existing data processing environment posesseveral problems. Due to the rapid technological evolution, the newapplications are normally based on different architectures compared tothe existing applications; making the new applications capable ofinteracting with the existing ones can be a real challenge. This problemis nowadays particularly felt, because a breed of new Internet-basedservices, for example for implementing e-business functions, isintroduced. These new services need to interact with existing businessfunctions within a company data processing system, such as legacyapplications.

Similar problems may be encountered when already existing componentsneed to collaborate to implement a new service.

In order to integrate a new application within a framework of existing,heterogeneous applications, or to make existing heterogeneousapplications interact to achieve a new function, several criticalfactors, both technical and applicative, need to be considered. Multipledifferent skills in the field of information technology are involved,with a consequent increase in costs and time.

Four possible methodologies can be identified.

A first approach tries to maximally exploit the existing processes; inorder to enable a new process to interact with an existing process, aninterface layer is created capable of interpreting and properlytranslating requests from a business process into services and relatedcoherence controls. Investements made for developing the alreadyexisting applications are in this way preserved.

According to a second approach, redundant functions are developed. Thefunctions necessary for carrying out a new business process, albeitalready present in the existing environment, are replicated in the newenvironment. The result is duplication of functions and data, causingincreased development and management time and costs. Additionally,problems of reconciliation of the duplicated data may arise.

Following a third approach, the already existing functions are modifiedto adapt to the requirements of the new business process to beimplemented. This involves a highly accurate knowledge of the existingfunctions and environment, and the availability of professional skillswhich may be not readily available. Consequently, the costs can be veryhigh.

Finally, a fourth approach provides for developing a new applicationincluding both the new business processes and the business processesalready in production. Apart from the costs, a rather long time may berequired to put the new processes into production, with a negativeimpact on a company core business.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

In view of the state of the art outlined in the foregoing, it has beenan object of the present invention to provide a data processing systemcapable of supporting etherogeneous applications.

According to the present invention, this and other objects have beenattained by means of a data processing system as set forth in appendedclaim 1.

Briefly stated, the data processing system comprises at least oneresource manager for managing changes to respective system resources inaccordance to a commit/backout protocol, and a resource managercoordinator for coordinating the commit/backout activities of the atleast one resource. manager.

A process resource manager is provided for, coordinated by the resourcemanager coordinator according to the commit/backout protocol, formanaging the execution of non-compliant processes not complying with thecommit/backout protocol. Upon receipt of a backout request, the processresource manager automatically determines a sequence of compensationactions to be performed to backout actions performed during theexecution of the non-compliant processes.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

The features and advantages of the present invention will be madeapparent by the following detailed description of an embodiment thereof,provided merely by way of a non-limiting example, which will be madewith reference to the attached drawings, wherein:

FIG. 1 is a schematic block diagram of the main components of atransaction management system according to an embodiment of the presentinvention;

FIGS. 2A schematically show the managing of unit of and 2B works by aresource manager coordinator of the transaction management system ofFIG. 1;

FIG. 3 schematically shows services provided by a service providersubsystem of the transaction management system of FIG. 1;

FIG. 4 schematically shows a business request catalog held by a businessrequest cataloging service provided by the service provider subsystem;

FIG. 5 schematically shows a counterpart system directory held by adirectory service provided by the service provider subsystem;

FIG. 6 schematically shows a system recovery procedure implemented by asystem recovery service provided by the service provider subsystem;

FIG. 7 schematically shows the operation of the transaction managementsystem.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENT

Referring to the drawings, FIG. 1 schematically shows, in terms offunctional blocks, the main components of a transaction processingsystem according to an embodiment of the present invention.

The transaction processing system comprises a data processing systemSYS, hosting a transaction manager system TM, in the following shortlyreferred to as transaction manager.

The transaction manager TM manages business service requests BR (in thefollowing referred to as business requests) issued by applicationsrunning either locally to the data processing system SYS that hosts thetransaction manager TM, such as the application APP in the shownexample, or in a remote data processing system, for example on a clientcomputer connected to an enterprise's data processing system over theInternet. By way of example, the data processing system SYS is afront-end server of a bank agency, receiving business service requestsby a bank ATM.

The data processing system SYS is connected to one or more distinct dataprocessing systems, such as the two data processing systems C_SYS1 andC_SYS2 shown in the drawing, in the following referred to as counterpartsystems. The data processing system SYS can interact with thecounterpart systems C_SYS1, C_SYS2 for servicing the business requests.The system SYS and the counterpart systems C_SYS1, C_SYS2 may beconnected over a LAN, a sysplex, a cluster, a WAN, the Internet. Thesystem SYS and the counterpart systems C_SYS1, C_SYS2 may form a localset of data processing systems, such as a sysplex or a cluster, and thelocal set of systems may be connected to one or more geographicallyremote data processing systems or set of systems. Reverting to thepreviously cited example, the system SYS (front-end bank agency server)is connected to a bank agency main server, which is in turn connected toa network of other main servers in different bank agencies.

The data processing system SYS hosts a resource manager coordinator RMC,controlling and coordinating the activity of a plurality of resourcemanagers RM. Each resource manager is in charge of managing respectivesystem resources (not shown in the drawing), such as databases,archives, data tables, files, data records and the like. Each resourcemanager RM manages changes to the respective resources, requested by ageneric task running under the control of the transaction manager TM.

A feature of a transaction processing system, called atomicity, is thataccess and updates to system resources are typically carried out by theexecution of discrete transactions, also referred to as units of work(hereinafter, UOWs). A UOW is a sequence of coordinated operations onsystem resources such that either all of the changes take effect or noneof them does. These operations are typically changes made to data heldin storage in the transaction processing system. In this way, systemresources are prevented from being made inconsistent to each other. Ifone of the set of update operations fails then the others must also nottake effect. A UOW then transforms a consistent state of systemresources into another consistent state, without necessarily preservingconsistency at all intermediate steps.

The atomic nature of the transactions is maintained by means of atransaction synchronization procedure commonly called commit procedure.Logical points of consistency at which resource changes are synchronisedwithin the transaction execution are called commit points; a UOW isclosed by the task declaring a commit upon reaching a commit point, orwhen the task terminates.

Atomicity of a transaction is achieved by resource updates made withinthe transaction being held in doubt (uncommitted) until a commit isdeclared upon completion of the transaction. If the transactionsucceeds, the results of the transaction are made permanent (committed);if the transaction fails, all effects of the unsuccessful transactionare rejected (backed out or rolled back). That is, the resource updatesare made permanent and visible to tasks other than the one under whichthe resource updates were carried out only upon successful completion;for the duration of each unit of work, all updated resources must thenbe locked to prevent further update access. On the contrary, when atransaction backs out, the resources are restored to the consistentstate existing before the transaction began.

The changes requested by a task to the system resources managed by ageneric resource manager RM are managed by that resource manager in sucha way as to allow a postponed commit thereof, depending on the outcomeof the task, upon receival of a commit request by the resource managercoordinator RMC, under a single- or two-phase commit protocol. Theconsolidation or the rejection of the changes to system resources can betriggered explicitly by a commit or backout command, or implicitly bythe successful or unsuccessful termination of the task. The resourcemanager coordinator RMC receives the explicit commit or backout command,or an indication of the successful or unsuccessfull termination of thetask, and propagates a commit or backout request to the resourcemanagers RM responsible of managing the system resources involved in thechanges.

The transaction manager TM includes a business request manager subsystemBRM, an extended resource manager subsystem ERM and a service providersubsystem SER, providing services to both the business request managersubsystem BRM and the extended resource manager subsystem ERM.

The business request manager BRM is activated by the transaction managerTM whenever a business request BR is received. The transaction managerTM detects the incoming business request and activates the businessrequest manager BRM. The incoming business request BR is managed by thebusiness request manager BRM as a service request directed to a generictransaction or application; the service request is processed by a taskT1, involving one or more UOWs.

As will be explained in detail hereinbelow, the business request managerBRM, activated by the transaction manager TM upon launching of the taskT1, started for processing the business request BR, exploits servicesprovided by the service provider subsystem SER for controlling the taskexecution.

In particular, the business request manager BRM implements a businessrequest classification scheme and exploits different services providedby the service provider SER depending on the business request class towhich the incoming business request BR belongs.

In general, depending on the business process flow, during the executionof the task Ti launched for processing the incoming business request BR,one or more service requests may be generated that are directed todifferent programs or transactions, operating either in the same systemSYS hosting the transaction manager TM, or in one or more of thecounterpart systems C_SYS1, C_SYS2, such as the service requests OBR1and OBR2 shown in FIG. 1 and hereinafter referred to as outboundbusiness requests or, shortly, OBRs. These service requests, which aretreated similarly to incoming business requests BR, cause tasks T21, T22to be launched within the respective counterpart systems C_SYS1, C_SYS2to which the OBRs are directed, and are managed by the extended resourcemanager ERM.

It is observed that, in the context of the present description, an OBRis not only a business request issued in respect of a counterpart systemof the system SYS, but also a business request issued in respect of acomponent, e.g. an application, of the system SYS but featuring a weaklink, i.e., a component that cannot be subjected to a commit/backoutprotocol.

Interfacing processes not complying with commit protocols, i.e.,processes whose UOWs are not homogeneously coordinated during thebackout phase by a resource manager coordinator, makes it necessary tomanage a compensation activity (implicit or explicit) directed to makingthe system converge towards a coherent state determined dynamically.This is triggered by malfunctionings or explicit backout requests, andis managed by the extended resource manager ERM by the explicitactivation of compensation components (XBRs and/or XOBRs, described indetail later on), or by retrieving what previously recorded by a logservice provided by the service provider subsystem SER. The informationnecessary to the compensation activity is determined dynamically, on thebasis of the information recorded by the log service during thepreceding elaboration phases (possibly including previous compensationattempts).

In particular, the extended resource manager ERM is seen by thetransaction manager TM as one of the resource managers RM. Thetransaction manager TM activates the extended resource manager ERM eachtime an OBR, e.g. the OBRs OBR1 , OBR2, is issued; as will be explainedlater on, an OBR may explicitly invoke the extended resource managerERM, or the latter may be invoked implicitly. Briefly stated, theextended resource manager ERM supervises the execution of the OBRs andguarantees that they are correctly executed even in case of anomalies,such as in case of in-doubt situations possibly arising during theexecution of the UOWs involved in the processing of the OBRs. From theviewpoint of the resource manager coordinator RMC, the extended resourcemanager ERM manages the OBRs, and the processes running on counterpartsystems for servicing the OBRs, in a way similar to that the resourcemanagers RM manage the respective system resources, enabling theimplementation of a single- or two-phase commit/backout protocol of theprocesses running on the counterpart systems.

In particular, the extended resource manager ERM identifies, activatesand monitors the secondary processes (in the example, the tasks T21 andT22) invoked by the primary process (T1) and activated by the businessrequest manager BRM. While the changes made to the system resourcesmanaged by the resource managers RM can be backed out and the systemresources brought back to the state in which they were before suchchanges were applied, this is in general not possible for the changescaused by the secondary processes. Problems of communication protocolbetween the system SYS and the counterpart systems, behaviour of thelatter and the like, which in this context will be globally referred toas problems of labile link, may make it impossible to revert thecounterpart systems to the state in which they were before the secondaryprocesses were launched. In general, instead of a true backout, theextended resource manager ERM manages a compensation activity of thechanges made by the secondary processes.

During the life cycle of a generic task, several UOWs can besequentially instantiated, and be committed or backed out. Each UOW isidentified by a univocal identification code(UOWID), used for managingthe UOW. The commit or backout of a UOW causes the automatic end of theUOW under execution and makes it possible to instantiate a new UOW, ifrequired by the business logic.

During the execution of the task T1, changes to system resources managedby different resource managers RM may be requested. In this case, aplurality of correlated UOWs are simultaneously instantiated; all thesecorrelated UOWs are subordinated to a main UOW, which in the followingwill be referred to as coordination UOW (COO-UOW), managed by theresource manager coordinator RMC. This situation is schematically shownin FIG. 2A, wherein the UOWs UOW1, UOW2 and UOW are correlated andmanaged by the resource manager coordinator RMC as a coordination UOWCOO-UOW.

Similarly, during the execution of the task T1 (main task) correlatedtasks T21, T22 (secondary tasks) can be launched on differentcounterpart systems C_SYS1, C_SYS2; several UOWs potentially correlatedto each other are thus simultaneously logically associated with the maintask Ti; also in this case, all these UOWs are subordinated to aCOO-UOW, managed by the resource manager coordinator RMC. This situationis schematically depicted in FIG. 2B.

In this second case, and provided that the links between the system SYSand the counterpart systems are strong (i.e., not labile, enabling theimplementation of a commit/backout protocol), the resource managers inthe counterpart systems, such as the resource manager C-RMC1 in thecounterpart system C_SYS1 shown in FIG. 2B, may be coordinated by theresource manager coordinator RMC of the system SYS, or they can becoordinated by the local resource manager coordinators, in turncoordinated by the resource manager coordinator RMC in the system SYS.In any case, all the instantiated UOWs are subordinated to a uniqueCOO-UOW.

If instead the links between the system SYS and the counterpart systemsare labile, several COO-UOWs will be set up, each one managed by arespective resource manager coordinator, which are not coordinated toeach other. Such COO-UOWs, for example the COO-UOWs COO-UOW1 andCOO-UOW2 in FIG. 2B, are handled by the extended resource manager ERM asan extended UOW EXT-UOW, in the following referred to as EXT-UOW.

Normally, the changes to the data requested by each task, grouped asUOWs, are managed by the resource managers RM, coordinated by theresource manager coordinator RMC, so as to allow more taskssimultaneously acting on shared archives. The changes requested by ageneric task are rendered public and available to the other tasks onlyafter the commit of the associated UOW; if the UOW is backed out, thechanges are not consolidated and the data in the archives are renderedpublic to the other tasks in an unaltered form. In this way, it isguaranteed that the different tasks access coherent data, not subjectedto partial changes by other tasks. The capability of the transactionprocessing system of managing logically coherent groups of dataexploited by programs or transactions is referred to as referentialintegrity.

The UOWs coordinated by a COO-UOW may however include both UOWscomplying to a commmit/backout protocol (compliant UOWs), and UOWs(so-called non-compliant UOWs) that, due to the nature of the processesor resources involved, do not support a commit/backout protocol. TheCOO-UOW is in this case referred to as extended UOW (EXT-UOW).

Differently from the case of a COO-UOW made up by compliant UOWs, in thecase of an EXT-UOW the presence of non-compliant UOWs prevents thenormal data integrity scheme from being ensured, at least for that partof changes occurring within non-compliant UOWs. The consolidation ofthose changes to the system resources made during the execution of thecompliant UOWs is postponed and subordinated to the outcome of the maintask; the remaining changes to the system resources made during theexecution of the non-compliant UOWs can be consolidated eithercontextually to their execution or at the end of the associatedsecondary task. The successful completion of the main task associatedwith an EXT-UOW does not pose problems, because all the changes areconfirmed: the changes made within compliant UOWs are confirmed, thechanges made within non-compliant UOWs, already consolidated, need notbe backed out. Differently, a possible backout request (eitherapplicative or infrastructural) produces a misalignment in the resourcesinvolved: the changes yet uncommitted can be and are backed out, whilethe changes already consolidated because not subjected to a commitprotocol cannot be and are not backed out. In this case, the state ofthe whole system (the system SYS and the counterpart systems C_SYS1,C_SYS2) cannot be brought back to the state before the changes weremade; a specific compensation activity needs to be carried out, directedto making the whole system converge towards a coherent state determineddynamically, because the system cannot be brought back to the initialstate.

This involves two levels of exposition of the system. A first level ofexposition is generated in case of commit of the changes brought withinthe compliant UOWs, due to the different timing by which the changeddata are rendered public to different tasks. A second level ofexposition is generated in consequence of a backout of the changesbrought by a task, and is due to the difference by which the systemservices the backout request: the changes made within compliant UOWs arebacked out immediately, while the changes made within non-compliant UOWsare compensated, and the compensation may even be postponed. A temporarymisalignment may occur of logically-correlated data which are renderedpublic at different times and in a non-definitive form.

Making reference to FIG. 3, the services implemented by the serviceprovider subsystem SER are schematically shown, in an embodiment of thepresent invention. Some of the services provided by the service providersubsystem SER are exploited by the business request manager BRM, otherservices are exploited by the extended resource manager ERM, and someservices are exploited by both the business request manager BRM and theextended resource manager ERM. In particular, a subset of services isprovided commonly to every task launched by the business request managerBRM, be it a task associated with a classified business request or atask associated with a non-classified business request. The list ofservices provided by the service provider subsystem SER includes: abusiness request cataloging service CATS, a directory service DIRS, atask recovery service TSR, a system recovery service SYSR, aconnectivity service CNCT, a log service LOG, a monitor service MON, aUOW protection service UOW-P, an error recovery service ERR, a businessrequest protection service BRPR, a business request verify service BRVR.

The services which are commonly provided to both classified andnon-classified business requests include the log service LOG, themonitor service MON, the UOW protection service UOW-P and the errorrecovery service ERR.

The specific services for the classified business requests include, inaddition to the common services, the cataloging service CATS, thebusiness request protection service BRPR and the business request verifyservice BRVR. The services exploited by the business request manager BRMinclude the business request protection service BRPR, the error recoveryservice ERR, the UOW protection service UOW-P, the business requestverify service BRVR, the monitor service MON, the log service LOG andthe cataloging service CATS.

The services exploited by the extended resource manager ERM include thecataloging service CATS, the log service LOG, the UOW protection serviceUOW_P, the monitor service MON, the error recovery service ERR, theconnectivity service CNCT, the directory service DIRS, the task recoveryservice TSR and the system recovery service SYSR.

The business request classification scheme implemented by the businessrequest manager BRM relies on the business request cataloging serviceCATS in order to classify an incoming business request as a classifiedbusiness request CBR, listed in a business request catalog held by thecataloging service CATS, or a non-classified business request NCBR, notpresent in the catalog.

The services implemented by the service provider subsystem SER will bedescribed in detail later on.

In operation, the business request manager BRM and the extended resourcemanager ERM classify the service requests, be they incoming businessrequests to the transaction processing system or service requestsgenerated during the processing of a previously received businessrequest, taking into account the nature of the component (applicationprogram, transaction, infrastructure service, e.g. a connector) to whichthe service request is directed and the logic state of the processassociated therewith (running, backing out, pending, in-doubt etc.).

The behaviour of the business request manager BRM and the extendedresource manager ERM depends on the status of the entity issuing theservice request, on the kind of service request issued and on the statusof the component to which the service request is directed.

Each service request, both coming from outside the system SYS orgenerated while servicing an already received business request, isanalysed by the business request manager BRM. The service request mayinclude an explicit indication that the service request is directed tothe business request manager BRM or the extended resource manager ERM(explicit service request): in this case, the business request managerBRM either directly handles the service request or invokes the extendedresource manager ERM. If the service request includes no such explicitindication (implicit service request), the service request isintercepted by the monitoring service MON and passed to the businessrequest manager BRM. Exploiting the catologing service CATS, thebusiness request manager BRM determines the kind of service request. Ifthe service request is classified, it will be handled by the businessrequest manager BRM or by the extended resource manager ERM. If on thecontrary the service request results to be non classified, it is routedback to and serviced by the transaction manager TM.

In an embodiment of the invention, the following classification schemeof the possible service requests is adopted.

Non-classified business requests (in the following referred to as NCBRs)are generic service requests issued in respect of transactions orprograms managed by the transaction manager TM, which the businessrequest manager BRM cannot associate with any of the service requestslisted in a business request catalog held by the cataloging serviceCATS; the services provided by the business request manager BRM to theNCBRs are only those belonging to the subset of common services. An NCBRcan issue any kind of business request, either explicit or implicit,classified or non-classified, as well as access system resources, eitherrecoverable or not.

Classified business request (in the following referred to as CBRs) areservice requests which the business request manager BRM can associatewith one of the service requests listed in the catalog held by thecataloging service CATS.

Within the class of CBRs, the following categories of business requestsare additionally defined.

Non-protected classified business requests (in the following referred toas NPCBRs) are CBRs for which the business request manager BRM providesall of the common services, plus the cataloging service CATS and theverify service VER. In case the processing of an NPCBR is not completed,due to errors or anomalies, the business request manager BRM does notundertake any action directed to the automatic re-activation of thebusiness request, leaving the burden of this to the original requesterof the service. An NPCBR may issue any kind of business request, eitherimplicit or explicit, classified or non-classified, and access systemresources, either recoverable or not.

Protected classified business requests (in the following referred to asPCBRs) are CBRs benefiting of all the services implemented by thebusiness request manager BRM, including the protection service BRPR.Differently from the NPCBRs, if the processing of a PCBR is notcompleted due to an error or an anomaly, the business request managerBRM, exploiting the business request protection service, automaticallymanages the re-activation of the business request, so as to assure theprocessing thereof and the completion, possibly postponed. A PCBR mayissue any kind of business request, either explicit or implicit,classified or non-classified, and access system resources, eitherrecoverable or not. Should a PCBR (main PCBR) issue another PCBR(secondary PCBR), the protection service is only provided to the mainPCBR, and not to the secondary one, to avoid multiple activations of thesecondary PCBR. It is observed that secondary PCBRs issued by NPCBRs orNCBRs are not provided with the protection service, and are notautomatically reactivated; in other words, only main PCBRs arereactivated. Compensation business requests (in the following referredto as XBRs) are a particular kind of PCBR, activated for carrying outactivities of backout or, more generally, compensation. The XBRs aredirected to programs or transactions operating within the system SYShosting the transaction manager TM. In particular, the XBRs areautomatically activated by the extended resource manager ERM when thelatter is notified by the resource manager coordinator RMC about anerror or a backout request. An XBR, working under the control of thebusiness request manager BRM and the extended resource manager ERM, mayissue compensation outbound business requests (XOBRs, described lateron), NCBRs and CBRs, as well as access system resources, eitherrecoverable or not. Being a particular kind of PCBRs, XBRs benefit ofthe protection service, and are automatically reactivated.

As far as the OBRs are concerned, the following categories are defined.

Non-recoverable outbound business requests (in the following referred toas NROBRs) are service requests issued, explicitly or implicitly, byNCBRs or CBRs (either NPCBRs, PCBRs or XBRs), and directed to programsor transactions operating in a counterpart system C_SYS1, C_SYS2, eitherlocal or remote to the system SYS, or directed to a component of thesystem SYS but weakly linked thereto. For handling the NROBR, the ERMexploits the cataloging service CAT, the directory service DIR, the taskrecovery service TSR, the system recovery service SYS_R and theconnectivity service CNCT. When anomalies or backout requests takeplace, the extended resource manager ERM does not undertake an attemptof recovery of the outbound business request. An NROBR may access systemresources, either recoverable or not, as well as issue any kind ofservice request, depending on the business logic and the features of thecounterpart system to which it is.

Explicit-compensation, recoverable outbound business requests (in thefollowing referred to as EROBRs) are service requests issued by NCBRs orCBRs, directed to programs or transactions operating in a counterpartsystem C_SYS1, C_SYS2, or directed to a component of the system SYS butweakly linked thereto. When anomalies or backout requests take place,the extended resource manager ERM directly starts the activities for theexplicit compensation of the EROBR; to this purpose, the servicesprovided by the service provider subsystem SER, particularly the logservice LOG, the UOW protection service UOW_P, the connectivity serviceCNCT, the monitor service MON and the error recovery service ERR areexploited. An EROBR may access system resources, either recoverable ornot, as well as issue any kind of service request, depending on thebusiness logic and the features of the counterpart system to which it isdirected.

Implicit-compensation, recoverable outbound business requests (in thefollowing referred to as IROBRS) are service requests, issued by NCBRsor by CBRs, directed to programs or transactions operating incounterpart systems, or directed to a component of the system SYS butweakly linked thereto. When anomalies or backout requests take place,the extended resource manager ERM does not directly start the activitiesfor the compensation of the IROBR; on the contrary, the compensation iscarried out implicitly, that means postponed to the time of re-executionof the IROBR; such a re-execution is, managed automatically by thebusiness request manager BRM if the IROBR is invoked by a PCBR, or it isactivated by the service requester in case the IROBR is issued by aNPCBR. The extended resource manager ERM exploits the services providedby the service provider subsystem SER, in particular the log serviceLOG, the unit of work protection service UOW_P, the connectivity serviceCNCT, the monitor service MON and the error recovery service ERR. AnIROBR may access system resources, either recoverable or not.Compensation outbound business request (in the following referred to asXOBRs) are a particular kind of IROBR, and are service requests issuedby XBRs operating within specific tasks, governed by the extendedresource manager ERM in support of previously-issued EROBRs that need tobe compensated or not yet compensated due to errors or backout requests.The XOBRs may also be activated by infrastructure services in the taskrecovery phase (described later on). XOBRs are directed to programs ortransactions operating in counterpart systems or directed to a componentof the system SYS but weakly linked thereto. When an anomaly takesplace, the XOBRs are not activated automatically: only the XBRs, issuedby the extended resource managere ERM, can activate the XORs. An XOBRcan access system resources, either recoverable or not. The activationof the XBR and the XOBR is handled by the ERM, and no burden is put onthe requester application, which can be waiting for the completion codeof the task recovery phase or, in case a time-out is incurred, alreadynotified about the taking in charge by the extended resource manager ERMof the recovery operation.

Any business request, either non-classified (NCBR) or classified (CBR)and, if classified, either protected (PCBR) or not (NPCBR), may thusissue (implicitly or explicitly) the one or more OBRs (either NROBRs,EROBRs, IROBRs).

The above described classification of the service requests, to beadopted in the development of new applications in order to correctlyidentify the components necessary for implementing the desired businessprocess, guarantees that, in case of errors, anomalous events or backoutrequests, coordinated by the transaction manager TM through the resourcemanager coordinator RMC, the proper application or infrastructurecomponents are activated for managing the compensation of everything hasbeen done up to that point on the data involved in an EXT-UOW. It isthus guaranteed that, in case of errors, anomalies or applicationbackout requests, the state of the resources involved in an EXT-UOWconverge towards a coherent final state, by means of the automaticexplicit compensation, or the postponed implicit compensation, governedby the business request manager BRM and the extended resource managerERM.

In particular, in case of unsuccessful completion of a task involving anEXT-UOW, the business request manager BRM and the extended resourcemanager ERM are able to identify and automatically activate theprocesses for making the whole system (that is, the resources involved)converge towards the initial state, when possible, or towards a coherentstate determined dynamically by the business request manager BRM, theextended resource manager ERM and the application business logicpossibly embedded on the XBRs/XOBRs. Although any kind of XBR can bedeveloped, a default XBR implements the compensation phase issuing inthe reverse sequence the XOBRs related to each EROBR acting on the baseof the outcomes of calls to the connectivity service CNCT, and theoutcome of each invoked XOBR.

The services implemented by the business request manager BRM and theextended resource manager ERM will be now described in detail.

Cataloging Service CATS

The cataloging service CATS allows classifying the business requestsaccording to the classification scheme described in the foregoing.

The cataloging service CATS operates on the basis of a catalog CAT, anexample of which is schematically depicted in FIG. 4. The catalog CAT isa table having a plurality of records. Each catalog record includes aplurality of fields BRID/CLID, BRCLS, ASSCMP, STUPSTAT, IN-FLGT STAT,C-SYS, SUB C-SYS, HEADER, TRAILER, ASSBR, XBR/XOBR, USAUT/ACC, MSGFRMT,OTHER INFO.

The field BRID/CLID contains a business request identifier (A, B, C, . .. ), identifying a classified business request, or a business requestclass identifier (e.g. NPCBR, NCBR . . . ), identifying a businessrequest class. The field BRID/CLID is the entry key to the catalog CAT.

The field BRCLS contains a business request class identifier (e.g.,NPCBR, PCBR, OBR, XBR, XOBR), specifying the class of the businessrequest identified in the associated field BRID/CLID.

The field ASSCMP contains an indication of the components (programs ortransactions or both) associated with the business request identified inthe associated field BRID/CLID. For example, for the business requestidentified as A no associated program or transaction is specified in thecatalog: when the business request A is received, the component which isactivated is A itself; differently, for the business request identifiedas P, the program PGh and the transaction Trk are specified, meaningthat when the business request P is received, the program Pgh within thetransaction Trk will be activated.

The field STUPSTAT defines the status (ON or OFF) to be attributed tothe business request at the system start-up (described in detail lateron). The field IN-FLGT STAT contains an indication of the current statusof the business request, when it is in flight.

The field C-SYS defines, for the OBRs, the counterpart system to whichthey are directed. In case the counterpart system has one or moresubsystem associated therewith, the field SUB C-SYS specifies to whichsubsystem of the counterpart system defined in the field C-SYS the OBRis directed to. The information stored in the fields C-SYS and SUB-C SYSforms access keys to the directory service.

The fields HEADER and TRAILER define business requests to be issuedpreliminary and, respectively, subsequently to servicing the businessrequest identified in the associated field BRID/CLID. In the shownexample, when the business request identified as A is received, beforeand after servicing it the business requests E and F are serviced,respectively.

The field ASSBR defines the business requests which can be issued whileservicing the business request identified in the associated fieldBRID/CLID. Referring again to the shown example, when the businessrequest identified as A is received (and after having serviced theheader business request E), the business requests G and. H are serviced(followed by the trailer business request F).

The field XBR/XOBR (mandatory for EROBRs) defines the compensationbusiness requests (XBRs or XOBRs) to be executed for compensating theactions performed by the business request identified in the associatedfield BRID/CLID. In the shown example, in order to compensate theactions performed while servicing the business request A, the XBR J isissued (which in turn corresponds to the XOBR sequence L and M). If nospecific XBR is specified for a given business request, a default XBRwill be invoked for compensating the actions performed by OBRs issuedwithin the business request; the compensation actions will be determinedby the extended resource manager ERM on the basis of the informationprovided by the service LOG. It is observed that no compensationbusiness requests can be associated with the XBRs and the XOBRs, sincethey are implicit compensation business requests, whose compensation iscarried out on the basis of the information provided by the service LOG(indicating the activities already executed and those still to beexecuted).

Summarising, as far as the business request A is concerned, theinformation stored in the catalog CAT provides that when the businessrequest A is received, the sequence of business requests E→G→H→F isactually issued and serviced; in case something goes wrong, compensationof the actions performed is carried out by the XBR J, which in turncorresponds to the sequence of XOBRs L→M. Concerning the businessrequest B, it is an alias of the business request P. In the event of afailure occurred after the issuing of the OBRs G and H, the default XBRis invoked by the extended resource manager ERM, and the reversesequence involving the XOBRs L and M is automatically implemented.

The field USAUT/ACC defines the user authority level and account for theexecution permission of the business request identified in theassociated field BRID/CLID.

The field MSGFRMT defines the format of (specifies the set of rules forinterpreting) the invocation message of the business request identifiedin the associated field BRID/CLID.

The field OTHER INFO is used to indicate that additional information canbe stored in the catalog CAT.

In addition to records for specific business requests (such as therecords identified as A, B, C etc. in FIG. 4), the catalog CAT may alsoinclude records providing default information for classes of businessrequests, such as the record identified as NPCBR (for all the businessrequests of the class NPCBR). When a business request is received whichis not found in the list A, B, C etc., but is identified as an NPCBR,the information stored in the record NPCBR of the catalog are applied.In the shown example, the default information specified for the classNPCBR include an ON status to be attributed to every NPCBR at the systemstart-up, and an XBR Z, which is invoked in case of errors or backoutrequests for compensating the actions performed by one or more OBRsissued within the NPCBR.

Additionally, the catalog CAT may also include a record specifyingdefault information in relation to NCBRs, such as the record NCBR in theshown example, to be attributed to any non-classified business request.

Finally, the catalog CAT may include records (such as the record NPCBRin the shown example) defining override information for specific classesof business requests.

The information retrieved from the catalog CAT contributes to thedefinition of the execution context of a business request. Inparticular, the cataloging process, or the process for defining theexecution context of a business request, is the following.

When a business request is issued, information may be provided thatdefines the execution context of the business request. This informationmay be provided explicitly, in case of the business request is invokedexplicitly, or deduced from the context of invocation of the businessrequest, in case of an implicit invocation. Typically, an explicitinvocation of a business request takes the form: a)APPcallBRM(BR,inpData,[XBR],[CTXT/ANNL data], [tran],[user]); b)BRcallERM(OBR,inpData,[C-SYS],[SUBC-SYS],[XOBR],[CTXT/ANNL data],[tran], [user]); c) XBRcallERM(XOBR, OBRinp/out/CTXT/ANNLdata, [C-SYS],[SUBC-SYS], [tran], [user], [previous XOBR in/reply/outcome])

where a) represents the case of an application APP issuing a businessrequest, either catalogued or not; b) represents the case of a businessrequest (catalogued or not) issuing an OBR; and c) represents the caseof an XBR invoking an XOBR during a compensation phase. The informationin square brackets is optional. In particular, BR is the invokedbusiness request identifier; inpData is the input message provided atthe invocation; C-SYS, SUBC-SYS are the identifiers of the counterpartsystem and sub-system; XBR is the identifier of the compensationbusiness request that will be activated by the system in case it isnecessary to perform a compensation; XOBR is the identifier of theoutbound compensation business request; CTXT/ANNL data representinformation, provided at the invocation time, that can be used by thesystem during the compensation phase; tran and user define the contextin which the invoked business request is to be executed (level ofauthority, transaction, etc.). The information provided at theinvocation time of an XOBR (case c)) may include the informationassociated with the OBR to be compensated, including the outcome/replymessage of the OBR.

This information is integrated with the information stored in thecatalog. Different priority levels are assigned to the different sourcesof information; in particular, the information provided together withthe invocation of the business request takes the priority over theinformation specified in the catalog for that business request, which inturn takes the priority over the default information specified in thecatalog for the class of business requests. If present, the overrideinformation specified in the catalog for the class of business requeststakes the highest priority.

It is to be observed that instead of a single catalog, two distinctcatalogs may be provided for, one for the business request manager BRMand the other for the extended resource manager ERM. The catalog orcatalogs may be structured in more than one table.

A dedicated component (configuration component) of the system SYSenables configuring the system, and particularly the catalog CAT.

Directory Service DIRS

The directory service DIRS provides information defining the executioncontext of the OBRs.

The directory service DIRS operates on the basis of a directory DIR, anexample of which is schematically depicted in FIG. 5. The directory DIRis a table having a plurality of records. Each directory record includesa plurality of fields C-SYS, SUB C-SYS, ASSCMP, C-SYS ST-UP STAT, C-SYSIN-FLGT STAT, CNCT ID, CNCT ATTR, SIGN-ON, IN-DOUBT, BACKOUT, VER, SYSREC MODE, TO, USAUT/ACC, MSGFRMT.

The fields C-SYS, SUB C-SYS are the entry keys for the directory DIR.When an OBR is invoked, this information is derived from the catalogingprocess described above.

The field ASSCMP, similarly to the field ASSCMP in the catalog CAT,contains an indication of the components (programs or transactions orboth) associated with the OBR. The information specified in this fieldof the directory overrides the one deriving from the cataloging processdescribed above; if no associated component is specified in thisdirectory field, the information deriving from the cataloging process isheld valid. Referring to the shown example, each time an OBR directed tothe counterpart system C-SYS2 is invoked, the remote program RMPGpwithin the remote transaction RMTRq will be executed.

The field C-SYS ST-UP STAT defines the status of the counterpart systemat the start-up of the system SYS; if this field is set to ON, no systemrecovery procedure for the counterpart system needs to be performed atthe start-up of the system SYS. The field C-SYS IN-FLGT STAT defines thecurrent status of the counterpart system: if set to ON, this fieldindicates that the counterpart system is available.

The field CNCT ID provides the identifier of the connector that theextended resource manager ERM invokes for establishing the connectionwith the counterpart system. The connector is the component in charge ofinterfacing the system SYS and the counterpart system to which the OBRis directed. Interfacing is intended to include handling thecommunication protocol at both the logical and physical levels. For eachcounterpart system, one or more connectors can be defined, the choice ofa given connector depending on communication problem considerations, onthe communication paradigm adopted and on the nature of the OBR.Preferably, each connector is designed so as to be capable of supportingat a time multiple sessions with one or more counterpart systems(multiple OBRs directed to one or more counterpart systems). Theconnectors assist the extended resource manager ERM in carrying out anyof the activities of OBR proposition, OBR compensation (XOBR), systemsign-on and verify phases, resolution of in-doubt situations.

When a new OBR is developed, the connector to be associated therewithneeds to be identified; if none of the available connectors is suitable,a new connector needs to be developed, according to the applicationprotocol of the new OBR and the activation protocol of the extendedresource manager ERM.

The field CNCT ATTR specifies information for the connector, such asattributes of the connection to be established, defining the kind ofcommunication and the resources to be exploited for establishing theconnection. This information overrides deafult information of theconnector.

The fields SIGN-ON, IN-DOUBT, BACKOUT and VER respectively specify thesign-on procedure, the in-doubt procedure, the backout procedure and theverify procedure activated in the system recovery phase (described lateron). If no specific procedures are identified in these fields, defaultprocedures implemented by the extended resource manager ERM areexploited; if instead specific procedures are specified, these areactivated in substitution of the default procedures.

The field SYS REC MODE specifies the system recovery/task recoveryescalation paradigm (described later on) to be adopted by the businessrequest manager BRM and the extended resource manager ERM for reactingto malfunctioning or unavailability of the counterpart system. Also inthis case, a default paradigm can be defined, which is adopted if nospecific information is provided in the directory.

The field TO specifies a time-out, i.e. the maximum time that theconnector (and the extended resource manager ERM) is authorised to waitfor a reply from the counterpart system; if the time-out lapses withoutreceiving a reply, the operation is classified as in-doubt.

The fields USAUT/ACC and MSGFRMT contain information similar to thatcontained the corresponding fields of the catalog CAT; in particular,the field USAUT/ACC specifies the user, and the associated privileges,with which the business request is to be serviced. The field MSGFRMTidentifies the format of the data provided with the invocation of theOBR.

When an OBR is issued, the information retrieved from the directory DIR(which is accessed through the access keys specified in the fields C-SYSand SUB C-SYS of the catalog CAT) completes execution contextinformation derived from the cataloging process. Some pieces ofinformation (in particular, the remote program/transaction associatedwith the OBR, the connection attributes, the time-out, the user and themessage format) are provided to the connector when invoked by theextended resource manager ERM; the extended resource manager ERMdirectly exploits the information concerning the counterpart systemstatus, the sign-on, in-doubt, backout and verify procedures and theescalation paradigm.

The directory DIR can be configured by means of the system configurationcomponent.

Log Service LOG

The log service LOG is directed to storing, in a dedicated archive (logarchive), synthetic and detailed information related to the activitiesof the system SYS, including the operations performed by the resourcemanager coordinator RMC and the resource managers RM, the businessrequest manager BRM and the extended resource manager ERM. The storedinformation provides a logically coherent view of the events occurred,which can be used when compensation activities are required.

The information stored in the log archive is explicitly provided by thebusiness request manager BRM or the extended resource manager ERM duringthe processing and/or the compensation of the business requests by thedifferent infrastructural components involved.

The log service LOG operates as a resoure manager under the coordinationof the resource manager coordinator RMC. The data are provided to thelog service by the business request manager or the extended resourcemanager; the resoure manager coordinator coordinates the log service,similarly to the other resource managers. The log service determines howthe information received by the business request manager or the extendedresource manager in respect of any UOW are to be treated: if a given UOWis committed, the information stored in the log archive in respect ofthat UOW are consolidated; if the UOW is backed out, the informationstored in the log archive in respect of that UOW are available for apossible compensation activity. The information provided by the businessrequest manager or the extended resource manager are completed withinformation relating to the context in which the UOW is executed (suchas for example a unit of work identifier, a status information, a unitof work completion code).

In order to allow a fast access to the information stored in the logarchive, the log service logically organizes the information stored inthe log archive. In particular, the information is organized by EXT-UOW,UOW of the EXT-UOW, task implementing the UOW, business request, OBRinvoked within the business request and counterpart system to which theOBR is directed. The identifier codes of the EXT-UOWs, UOWs, tasks,business requests, OBRs and counterpart systems are exploited.

When a business request is received, the transaction manager TMactivates a task, within which a transaction operates, implemented by aprogram. The transaction manager associates a UOW to the task, assigningthereto a univocal identifier code. If the business request isintercepted by the business request manager, a univocal identifier codeis assigned thereto. If an OBR is issued within the business request, aunivocal identifier code is assigned thereto. All these univocalidentifier codes are provided to the log service.

By means of the log service, the detailed history of each servicerequest (completed, not yet completed because in-flight or delayed) canbe determined, including the explicit or implicit compensationactivities.

In case of errors or in-doubt situations during the servicing of aservice request, the context information (either supplied by theextended resource manager and/or collected directly by the log service)are stored in the log archive, to be used for a successive elaborationand/or evaluation task/system recovery services.

Reverting to the invocation formts listed above, at the time an OBR isinvoked, the single OBR request can be accompanied by specific user dataANNL, also stored by the LOG service. These user data, becoming part ofthe OBR invocation context, can also be used for a successiveelaboration and/or evaluation by the task recovery service and thesystem recovery service, being available to the XBR process or beingdirectly supplied to the connectivity service CNCT.

The log service handles anchor points for identifying the EXT-UOWs,UOWs, tasks not yet completed. When an EXT-UOW is completed, a conditionreached upon commit of the changes brought to the resources during theexecution of the EXT-UOW or in consequence to a compensation action, theanchor points related to that EXT-UOW are deleted; in this way, it is atany time possible to easily determine which activities are beingexecuted, suspended or waiting to be completed.

In the compensation phase, the information received or captured andstored in the log archive enables determining punctually the sequence ofactivities required for reaching a dynamically-determined coherentstate. This information can also be mixed and/or rearranged at this timeby the XBR component or by the connectivity service CNCT, so as tocompose the XOBR input message. By default, in absence of any businesslogic added to the involved XBR or connector, the XOBR input message,built by the default XBR, can be one of the following (derived by theinformation stored in the catalog and/or in the directory):

-   -   the original OBR input message;    -   the OBR reply message;    -   the data CTXT/ANNL provided at the OBR invocation time;    -   a multi-segment message including the data IN/OUT/CTXT/ANNL.

More particularly, the data stored in the log archive depend on thecomponent involved and the nature of the business request, as reportedin the following table: data stored in the log business request typearchive NCBRs and NPCBRs not errors or malfunctioning; invocating OBRsinvocation of secondary PCBRs or NPCBRs NCBRs and NPCBRs invocatingerrors or malfunctioning; OBRs invocation of secondary PCBRs or NPCBRs;invocation of OBRs; logical outcome of each OBR invocated; commitrequests, and related outcome, for each invocated OBR; backout requests,and related outcome, for each invocated OBR; PCBRs invocating OBRsinvocation message; invocation reply message and related outcome; errorsor malfunctioning; invocation of secondary PCBRs or NPCBRs; invocationof OBRs; logical outcome of each OBR invocated; commit requests andrelated outcome; backout requests and related outcome NROBRs connectoractivation message or input message to the OBR; connector activationreply message or output message from the OBR; logical outcome of the OBRgenerated by the connector or infrastructure outcome; errors ormalfunctioning; in-doubt resolution activity outcome (if any) EROBRs andIROBRs connector activation message or input message to the OBR; contextinformation (if any) supplied for supporting the compensation activity;connector activation reply message or output message from the OBR;logical outcome of the OBR generated by the connector or infrastructureoutcome; errors or malfunctioning; in-doubt situation resolutionactivity outcome (if any) XBRs XBR invocation message (provided to theXBR when invoked, including input information to the correspondingbusiness request and output information generated by the correspondingbusiness request); XBR invocation reply message and related outcome;errors or malfunctioning; invocation of XOBRs by the XBR; logicaloutcome of each XOBR invocated; commit requests and related outcome;backout requests and related outcome XOBRs connector activation message(including the information provided to the connector when invoking theassociated OBR); connector activation reply message or output messagefrom the XOBR; logical outcome of the XOBR generated by the connector orinfrastructure outcome; in-doubt resolution activity outcome (if any)Error Recovery Service ERR

The error recovery service ERR is directed to controlling errorconditions, due to malfunctioning in the applications or in theinfrastructure. This service is activated by the transaction manager TMat the system start-up and whenever an error occurs during the executionof a service request directed to a transaction or program.

Before activating the error recovery service ERR, all the differentapplications or infrastructure components involved try to autonomouslyhandle the error condition to either solve it or to issue a suitablesignal. In general, not any error needs to be declared as such to thetransaction manager TM; an error condition may be declassed toapplication error, and be handled by the respective application.

If the error condition persists (either because the application is notcapable of handling the error condition or because the error conditioncannot be declassed, the transaction manager TM activates the errorrecovery service ERR. The error recovery service ERR, within the UOW ofthe task that caused the error condition, classifies and handles theerror condition; the context information is archived in the log archiveby the log service LOG; this information can be useful to the taskrecovery service TR and the business request protection service PR.

In particular, the information acquired is related to the logical stateof the business request manager BRM and the extended resource managerERM (determining the handling of the error condition), the kind ofactivity under execution (normal processing, backout, compensation,in-doubt resolution, system recovery, task recovery), the type ofcomponents involved, and the kind of error and how it was generated.

The error recovery service ERR determines the operations to beperformed, adopting one of the following actions: a) confirmation of theerror condition and return of control to the transaction manager TM; thetransaction manager automatically activates the backout proceduremanaged by the resource manager coordinator RMC; b) activation of thetask recovery procedure by the task recovery service TRS, for collectingand organising information that will be used by the extended resourcemanager ERM; the control is then returned to the transaction manager TM,which automatically activates the backout procedure managed by theresource manager coordinator RMC; the resource manager coordinator willthen invoke the extended resource manager ERM, which will performoperations in support of a possible compensation activity; c) activationof the task recovery procedure by the task recovery service TRS, andinhibition of the error-handling procedure; the control is returned tothe transaction manager TM for automatically activating the commitprocedure managed by the resource manager coordinator RMC; the errorcondition is thus not handled by the transaction manager.

The error recovery service ERR does not directly take part to the phasesof implicit or explicit compensation; this activities are managed by theextended resource manager ERM that, similarly to the other resourcemanagers RM, is activated by the resource manager coordinator RMC in thephase of backout of the changes occurred during the execution of theservice request.

In the a) and b) cases, a backout will be performed; the backout mayinvolve a compensation procedure, which may be preceded by a taskrecovery phase.

Concerning cases b) and c), in order to assure that, even in case ofapplication or infrastructure malfunctionings, the business resourcemanager BRM and the extended resource manager ERM, in charge of managingthe postponed compensation activities, are properly activated, the errorrecovery service ERR always activates the task recovery service TRS inpresence of PCBRs, XBRs and XOBRs.

UOW Protection Service UOW-P

This service guarantees the integrity of the UOWs under which one ormore application programs operate in the processing of a servicerequest. Exploiting the log service LOG, the UOW protection serviceUOW-P intercepts the explicit commit and backout requests issued by theapplications involved in the processing of a business request,inhibiting the execution of the commit commands; the backout commandsare executed and notified to business request manager BRM and theextended resource manager ERM, as well as made available to any otherapplication or component, to allow the postponed handling of thepossible misalignment incurred.

In particular, the UOW protection service prevents explicit commitcommands from being executed in the case of a COO-UOW or an EXT-UOW,thus avoiding a fragmentation thereof; in the case of a backout command,the command is executed and the UOW protection service notifies thebusiness request manager and the extended resource manager. The UOWprotection service thus protects the integrity of COO-UOWs and EXT-UOWs,ensuring that all the activities executed for a service request aregoverned solely by coherent and non-fragmented UOWs. Each activity isthus implicitly considered completed only at the end of the processing,after the completion of the phases of input message acquisition, messageprocessing, reply output message generation.

Thanks to the UOW protection service, the business request manager BRMassures that each service request is univocally processed and produces aunivocal reply, avoiding the loss of input/output messages and/or thegeneration of multiple reply messages.

In this scenario, when a component (different from the business requestmanager and the extended resource manager) issues an explicit commitrequest, the processing is interrupted and an error condition isnotified to the transaction manager; the error condition is interceptedby the error recovery service, which will handle the error condition asdescribed hereinbefore. When a component issues an explicit backoutrequest, the command is executed, but the UOW protection servicenotifies the backout event to the business request manager and theextended resource manager, so that the event is successively handled,during the task termination phase.

Task Recovery Service TSR

This service is responsible of handling a task recovery procedure.

During the execution of a generic task (in-flight task) for processing abusiness request, errors, handled by the error recovery service ERR, orbackout requests, coordinated by the resource manager coordinator RMC,may take place. In both these cases, the task recovery procedure isactivated: in the first case, by the error recovery service ERR, asdescribed before, in the second case by the extended resource managerERM, activated in turn by the resource manager coordinator RMC.

The task recovery procedure is also activated at the startup of thesystem SYS within a system recovery procedure (to be described later),after a system failure or shutdown, to allow the business requestmanager and the extended resource manager identifying the businessrequests to be activated or reactivated. In particular, the businessrequest manager identifies and starts/restarts the PCBRs previouslyin-flight or waiting, while the extended resource manager identifies andstarts/restarts the compensation business requests (XBRs) previouslyin-flight or waiting. To this purpose, the task recovery service mergesthe information obtained from the log service LOG and the informationsupplied by the resource manager coordinator RMC (for the in-flighttasks and for the pending compensation tasks), to collect (for eachsingle task) the information necessary to the recovery phase in whichthe extended resource manager will be involved.

During the task recovery procedure, the data stored in the log archiveare analysed to identify, for every single task, the current UOW and,for each identified UOW, the related state and the involved resources.

After this operation, a complete list is obtained of the previouslyin-flight or pending PCBRs, that have to be re-activated by the businessrequest manager, and, for the extended resource manager, a complete listof the XBR/XOBR for compensating any previously in-flight businessrequest and a list of compensation pending business requests.

The PCBRs are immediately reactivated by the business request manager;the activation of EROBRs is instead postponed after the completion ofthe compensation phase (if any).

The extended resource manager activates the compensation tasks either atthe level of the single UOW, or in series to each other, at the level ofthe single counterpart system, depending on the information provided bythe cataloging service CAT and the directory service DIR.

System Recovery Service SYS-R

This service handles a system recovery procedure (schematically shown inFIG. 6) that is carried out at the startup of the system SYS for eachcounterpart system defined in the table DIR held by directory serviceDIRS. In the system recovery procedure, the extended resource manager ismainly involved, albeit also the business request manager is partlyinvolved as far as PCBRs are concerned.

The system recovery procedure allows establishing a univocalsynchronicity point between the system SYS and the counterpart systems,e.g. the systems C-SYS1, C-SYS2, from which to proceed with theexecution of the successive service requests.

In addition, the system recovery service also activates the systemrecovery procedure when anomalous events occur in connection with one ormore counterpart systems; such anomalous events, intercepted either bythe application components or by infrastructure services (extendedresource manager), may make it necessary to re-align the system SYS andthe counterpart systems, to establish a consistent point. In this case,the system recovery procedure is carried out selectively only in respectof the counterpart system(s) in which the anomalous events occurred.

An object of the system recovery procedure is to bring the logic stateof the counterpart system (known to the system SYS from the fields C-SYSST-UP STAT and SYS IN-FLGT STAT in the directory DIR) to ON, indicatingthat the counterpart system is operative, following a prescribedsequence of steps; to do this, both system and application functions maybe activated, if necessary by the extended resource manager.

In particular, the system recovery procedure includes the followingsteps: counterpart system quiesce (in the following, simply referred toas C-SYS QUIESCE), counterpart system stop (C-SYS STOP), counterpartsystem sign-on (C-SYS SIGN-ON), counterpart system in-doubt (C-SYSIN-DOUBT), counterpart system backout (C-SYS BACKOUT), counterpartsystem verify (C-SYS VERIFY), counterpart system ready (C-SYS READY).These steps will be discussed in detail in the following.

In the C-SYS QUIESCE step, the extended resource manager ERM logicallydisables the counterpart system, setting the respective state in thedirectory DIR to QUIESCE. In this way, any possible new business requestdirected to the counterpart system is rejected (if non protected) orpostponed (if protected) until the counterpart system is returned to theREADY (ON) status by the extended resource manager. The completion ofany in-flight activity, managed by the business request manager or theextended resource manager, related to the counterpart system is thenwaited for.

If this step cannot be successfully completed (for example because thereare in-flight transactions involving the counterpart system and thatcannot be completed) the whole system recovery procedure is postponed ofa time interval defined in the directory DIR (in the time-out field TO).After that time interval has lapsed, the system recovery procedure isactivated again.

In the C-SYS STOP step, entered in case of successful outcome of theC-SYS QUIESCE step, the extended resource manager forces to STOP thestate of the counterpart system specified in the directory DIR. When thestate of a counterpart system is STOP, it is ensured that no activityrelated to the counterpart system is running in the system SYS; the STOPstate also declares that the counterpart system is not available forprocessing service requests. The compensation of UOWs is interrupted andpostponed to the successive C-SYS BACKOUT step. The state of thecounterpart system is automatically forced to SIGN-ON.

A counterpart system may be forced to the STOP state also by a commandof a system manager component of the system SYS; in this case, thecounterpart system remains in the STOP state until the system recoveryprocedure is successively re-activated.

In the C-SYS SIGN-ON step the system SYS establishes a logic link toand/or a consistency point with the counterpart system. Based on theinformation in the directory DIR (field SIGN-ON), the prescribed sign-onprocedure intended to manage this activity for that counterpart systemis identified and activated. If no specific sign-on procedure isdeclared in the directory for that counterpart system, the extendedresource manager performs default actions, implemented by theconnectivity service (i.e., the connector component). The identifiedsign-on procedure can ask for services to the extended resource managerERM; these services, taking the form of NROBRs, carry out the phase ofmaking the system SYS identified by the counterpart system (exploitingthe information contained in the directory field USAUT/ACC), negotiatingthe counterpart system resources that the counterpart system will haveto allocate for supporting the service requests coming from the systemSYS, acquiring/negotiating the identification codes of the future OBRs.The OBR identification codes can remain in the application domain (i.e.,they are known only at the connector level) or be declared to theextended resource manager, so as to be then automatically correlated (atthe level of the log archive) to the future OBRs directed to thecounterpart system; for each OBR the application invoking the servicecan thus declare to the extended resource manager ERM the identifiercode associated with the invoked service request and to the receivedreply, in order to allow an automatic correlation between activationmessages, reply messages and tasks executed on the counterpart system.

The successful outcome of the C-SYS SIGN-ON step involves an automatictransition (from SIGN-ON to IN-DOUBT) of the state of the counterpartsystem specified in the directory DIR. In case of unsuccessful outcome,the whole system recovery procedure is postponed of a time intervaldefined in the time-out field TO if the directory DIR.

In the C-SYS IN-DOUBT step, possible in-doubt situations arising fromthe counterpart system are detected and resolved. In-doubt situationsare those in which the extended resource manager has not been able toacquire or univocally resolve the outcome of a generic OBR/XOBR issuedin respect of the counterpart system. The resolution of in-doubtsituations is essential for the successive C-SYS BACKOUT step, duringwhich the unresolved or suspended UOWs associated with recoverable OBRsthat generated an error will be analysed and elaborated. For example, ifa counterpart system shuts down, or the communication link thereto fallsduring the execution of an OBR, the extended resource manager sees theOBR as in-doubt until the state of the counterpart system is ascertained(in the C-SYS SIGN-ON step).

The resolution of in-doubt situations provides for determining theoutcome of each OBR/XOBR involved in an anomalous situation, andacquiring the reply message (if any) contextually generated. Byanomalous situation it is intended any event that prevented the extendedresource manager from acquiring the reply message: the anomaloussituation may be due to a failure in the processing of the OBR/XOBR, orto a generic error caused by the counterpart system.

On the basis of the information present in the directory DIR, thespecific procedure for managing the resolution of the in-doubt situationis identified and activated; if no specific procedure is identified, theextended resource manager performs default actions provided by theconnectivity service. For the resolution of the in-doubt situation, theOBR/XOBR identification codes negotiated in the C-SYS SIGN-ON step canbe exploited.

An in-doubt situation is considered resolved if the extended resourcemanager, on the basis of the information present in the log archive, iscapable of ascertaining whether the operation has been executed on thecounterpart system, which has been the outcome, and which reply messagehas been generated. Depending on the connector in charge of managing theconnection with the counterpart system (specified for example in thedirectory field CNCT ID), different modes for resolving in-doubtsituations are provided to the extended resource manager; for example,using the OBR/XOBR identifier code the connector may interrogate thecounterpart system to know the last operation performed by thecounterpart system, or the counterpart system may be capable of replying“done” or “undone” when explicitly requested if an OBR/XOBR has beenexecuted.

The successful outcome of the C-SYS IN-DOUBT step causes the state ofthe counterpart system to automatically change from IN-DOUBT to BACKOUT.In case of unsuccessful outcome, the whole system recovery procedure ispostponed of a time interval defined in the directory. When the systemrecovery procedure is performed on all the counterpart systems, and thein-doubt situations can be resolved only for some counterpart systems,these pass to the following step.

In the C-SYS BACKOUT step, the extended resource manager identifies thepending or unresolved UOWs relating to the OBRs issued in respect of thecounterpart system. Once these UOWs are identified, the compensationthereof is or is not attempted, depending on the information provided bythe cataloging service CATS and the directory service DIRS. Inparticular, compensation is attempted for the EROBRs, while thecompensation is not attempted for the IROBRs; additionally, the state ofthe XOBRs defined in the catalog field ST-UP STAT, IN-FLGT STAT isverified: if the status is OFF, the XOBRs are not issued.

The activation of the compensation tasks takes place in the taskrecovery procedure, managed by the task recovery service TSR.

The way each UOW is compensated is determined on the basis of thefollowing variables:

-   -   the cause of activation of the system recovery procedure (system        SYS startup or occurrence of anomalies or in-doubt situations);        this is determined from the state of the system SYS and the        component that invoked the system recovery procedure;

the restart mode of the system SYS (cold or warm);

the compensation modality (implicit or explicit) of each OBR involved inthe UOW;

the counterpart systems involved in any single UOW, and the respectivemodality of handling the recovery activity and the problem escalationparadigm (ASYS, SSYS etc.);

possible unilateral commands of purge of the UOW/OBR, issued through thesystem manager component;

outcome of each compensation step of the OBR: depending on the outcomeof previous compensation steps, the compensation activity may proceed,be suspended and resumed later on, be interrupted or be early completed.

These variables are acquired hierarchically: the attributes (specifiedin the catalog CAT) of each OBR are subordinated to the attributes(specified in the directory DIR) of the counterpart system, and thehighest priority is assigned to everything forced through the systemmanager component. In this way, the way the compensation procedure ishandled can be differentiated, so as to enable a wide range of behaviorsdirected to controlling and/or overcoming anomalous events.

A UOW may include NROBRs, EROBRs and IROBRs. Typically, NROBRs areinquiry service requests, and are not subjected to explicitcompensation.

As far as UOWs with only EROBRs are concerned, they are consideredcompensated when all the EROBRs have been compensated (by means ofXOBRs). The following compensation modalities are provided for:

ASYS modality: all the pending OBRs of a UOW are compensated in asequence that is the inverse of the original execution sequence; eachcompensation step is subjected to the application outcome of thepreceding compensation step. The UOW is declared resolved when thesequence, dynamically determined by the extended resource manager, issuccessfully completed. The counterpart system passes from the BACKOUTstate to the VERIFY state when all the related UOWs are resolved. Anunsuccessful outcome or an error condition detected in this phase causesthe suspension or the interruption of the compensation procedure; inthis case, the counterpart systems involved in the UOW are declared inerror and cannot pass through the C-SYS BACKOUT step, unlessinterventions through the system manager component take place or problemescalation sequences are defined in the directory DIR (causing theentering of the “SSYS”, “BSYS” or “BERR” modalities, describedhereinafter).

“SSYS” modality (default modality applied at the system restart time):the pending OBRs of a UOW are grouped according to the counterpartsystem to which the OBRs are directed; each group of OBRs is subjectedto compensation, in inverse sequence compared to the original executionsequence, subordinated to the outcome of every operation. Each group ofOBRs is considered resolved upon successful completion of the sequence,dynamically determined by the extended resource manager. The UOW isdeclared resolved when all the groups of OBRs are successfullycompleted. The counterpart systems then pass to the C-SYS VERIFY step.An unsuccessful outcome or an error condition detected in this phasecauses the suspension or the interruption of the compensation sequence;in this case, the counterpart systems are declared in error and cannotpass through the C-SYS BACKOUT step, unless interventions through thesystem manager component take place or problem escalation sequences aredefined in the directory, causing the passage to the “BERR” modality.

“BSYS” modality: all the pending OBRs of a UOW are compensated in theinverse sequence compared to the original execution sequence, and eachcompensation step is subordinated to the application outcome of thepreceding compensation step. The UOW is declared resolved when thesequence, determined dynamically by the extended resource manager, issuccessfully completed. If an unsuccessful outcome or an anomalous eventoccur, the sequence is modified, so as to postpone the compensation ofall the OBRs directed to the same counterpart system as the OBR thatcaused the unsuccessful outcome; such a counterpart system is declaredin error and cannot pass through the C-SYS BACKOUT phase, unlessinterventions through the system manager component take place. Acounterpart system which is not declared in error can pass to thefollowing C-SYS VERIFY step.

“BERR” modality: in this modality, instead of proceeding by singlecounterpart system, the compensation proceeds by single operation. Allthe pending OBRs of a UOW are compensated in the inverse sequencecompared to the original execution sequence, and each compensation stepis executed independently of the outcome of the preceding compensationstep. The UOW is declared resolved when the sequence of compensationsteps, determined dynamically by the extended resource manager, issuccessfully completed. If a compensation step gives an unsuccessfuloutcome, or anomalous events take place, the compensation of theinvolved OBR is postponed, and the following OBR in the sequence issubmitted to compensation. The counterpart system associated with an OBRin error is declared in error and cannot go through the C-SYS BACKOUTstep, unless intervention through the system manager component takeplace; otherwise, the counterpart system passes to the following C-SYSVERIFY step.

For UOWs including only IROBRs, no direct compensation action isundertaken; the compensation is postponed to a successive re-activationof the business request that issued the NROBRs or the IROBRs. All theassociated UOWs are suspended. The involved counterpart systems can passto the following C-SYS VERIFY step.

UOWs including both EROBRs and IROBRs are subjected to compensation asdescribed previously as far as EROBRs are concerned, while no directcompensation action is undertaken for the IROBRs. If all the EROBRs aresuccessfully resolved, the UOW is declared compensated or suspended; incase serious anomalies take place, the UOW is declared in error. If noerrors take place, the compensation of the IROBRs is postponed to thenext reactivation of the business request that issued them, as discussedabove; the involved counterpart systems can pass to the C-SYSTEM VERIFYstep. The presence of EROBRs in error causes the compensation activityto be postponed, and the associated counterpart system cannot pass tothe C-SYS VERIFY step, unless interventions through the system managercomponent take place.

When all the backout activities are completed, i.e. all the pending UOWsare resolved or forced by interventions of the system manager, or ifthere are no pending UOWs having pending OBRs whose explicitcompensation is to be executed by the counterpart system, a counterpartsystem can pass to the C-SYS VERIFY step. The counterpart systems thatcannot pass to the C-SYS VERIFY step are subjected to a postponedre-activation of the C-SYS BACKOUT step; if an unsuccessful outcome isonce again produced, the whole system recovery procedure is postponed ofa time interval specified in the directory field TO.

In the C-SYS VERIFY step the system SYS verifies the logical coherenceof the operations executed in respect of the counterpart system orsystems to which the OBRs are directed. On the basis of the informationstored in the directory field VER, the specific procedure (verifyprocedure) for managing the C-SYS VERIFY step is identified andactivated. The verify procedure may ask for services (taking the form ofNROBRs) to the extended resource manager for carrying out the verifyactivities; these activities may include acquiring/negotiating theidentifier codes of the OBRs directed to the counterpart system, andcomparing the acquired/negotiated identifier codes to the identifiercodes acquired/negotiated in the C-SYS SIGN-ON step, to verify that thesystem SYS and the counterpart systems are still aligned. Alternatively,the acquisition/negotiation of the OBR identifier codes may not becarried out in the C-SYS SIGN-ON step, and be performed only in thisstep. Each OBR may declare to the extended resource manager theidentifier code associated with the request and/or received reply, so asto enable an automatic association of the identifier code with the BRID,or accept the automatic association carried out by the extended resourcemanager. If no specific procedure is declared in the directory DIR, theextended resource manager performs default actions implemented by theconnectivity service.

The successful outcome of the C-SYS VERIFY step determines an automatictransition of the state of the counterpart system from the VERIFY stateto the READY (ON) state. In case of unsuccessful outcome, the wholesystem recovery procedure is postponed of a prescribed time interval,specified in the directory field TO.

The C-SYS READY phase is entered after having ascertained theavailability of the counterpart system for managing the applicationtraffic, formed by both generic OBRs and XOBRs. When the READY state isreached, the directory field C-SYS IN-FLGT STAT for the counterpartsystem is set to ON, and the counterpart system processes bothnewly-issued OBRs and anything waiting to be executed (becausepreviously postponed and now requested again by the extended resourcemanager); the business request manager re-launches PCBRS that are stillwaiting or were previously delayed due to unavailability of thecounterpart system. In particular, the OBRs are diverted by the extendedresource manager ERM to the connector associated to the counterpartsystem (specified in the directory field CNCT ID), and are monitored bythe monitor and log services. In case of error, the extended resourcemanager, coordinated by the resource manager coordinator RMC, handlesthe possible compensation activities. The counterpart system remains inthe READY state up to the re-activation of the system recoveryprocedure, triggered by serious malfunctionings, in-doubt cases,unavailability of the counterpart system (for example due to acounterpart system/connection link failure), or until the counterpartsystem is forced to the STOP state through the system manager component.

Business Request Protection Service BRPR

This service is exploited by the business request manager BRM forautomatically re-activating of the PCBRS. In particular, this servicemanages a business request queueing.

Business Request Verify Service BRVR

This service is exploited by the business request manager BRM forverifying that a same business request, different from a PCBR not yetcompleted, is not inadvertently reproposed one or more times. Thisservice, on the basis of the information provided by the catalogingservice CAT, can: enable the processing of the business request in anycase (default condition); interrupt the processing of the businessrequest; enable the processing of the business request if a previousattempt was interrupted due to a generic condition of error; return, inresponse to the business request, the previous outcome/reply message.The identification of the business request may be context-sensitive(input message data), or be based on a unique user identifier associatedwith the business request at the time it is issued.

The business request verify service is also exploited by the extendedresource manager ERM for managing the IROBRs at the time they arereactivated.

Connectivity Service CNCT

This service includes a plurality of connector components, which theextended resource manager ERM exploits for establishing a connectionlink with the desired counterpart system. The appropriate connector isdetermined from time to time on the basis of the information stored inthe catalog CAT and the directory DIR. The connector performs severalfunctions, and particularly manages the communication between the systemSYS and the counterpart systems; the connector may also performconversion of communication protocols and message formats.

In particular, the connector input and output information is: a) case ofOBR invocation (the sequence of actions leading to the connectoractivation is BRcall→ERM>CNCT→OBRAPPLexec): connector input: directorydata, OBR ID, [OBR identifier/counter], [CTXT data] connector output:OBR reply message, physical/logical outcome, [OBR identifier/counter];b) case of XOBR invocation (the sequence of actions leading to theconnector activation is ERMcall→XBRcall→ERM→CNCT→XOBRAPPLexec) connectorinput: directory data, XOBR ID, XOBR input data, OBR input/reply/outcomedata, [OBR CTXT/ANNL data], [XOBR/OBR identifiers/counters], (previousXOBR input/reply/outcome] connector output: XOBR reply message, XOBRphysical/logical outcome, (XOBR identifier/counter]; c) case ofinvocation in the C-SYS SIGN-ON, IN-DOUBT, and VERIFY steps of thesystem recovery procedure (the sequence of actions leading to theconnector activation is: ERMcall→[UserProg inDirectory→]CNCT>[OBRAPPLexec]) for invocation in the C-SYS SIGN-ON andVERIFY steps: connector input: directory data, [local OBR/XOBRidentifiers/counters] connector output: physical/logical outcome,[negotiated OBR/XOBR identifiers/counters] for invocation in the C-SYSIN-DOUBT step: connector input: directory data, OBR/XOBR: input data,[identifier/counter], [CTXT/ANNL data], connector output: OBR/XOBR:physical/logical outcome, [reply message], [identifier/counter] wheredata in square brackets are optional.

Monitor Service MON

This service intercepts commands issued to the transaction manager, androutes the commands to the business request manager; the businessrequest manager, exploiting the cataloging service CATS, determineswhich infrastructure component (the business request manager itself, theextended resource manager for the OBRs, or the transaction manager forthe NCBRs) will handle the command.

The operation of the transaction manager TM will be now discussed.

When the system SYS is started up, a system start-up procedure islaunched. The system start-up procedure activates the business requestmanager BRM and the extended resource manager ERM, and informs thetransaction manager TM and the resource manager coordinator RMC of theavailability of these infrastructure components; also the serviceprovider subsystem SER is activated.

The start-up procedure also acquires information from the resourcemanager coordinator RMC, and particularly the list of the pending UOWs.On the basis of this list, the extended table manager ERM scans the logarchive, and generates a matrix wherein, for each pending UOW, theinvolved XOBRs and counterpart systems are indicated. The systemrecovery service SYS-R is invoked: for each counterpart system found inthe matrix, a system recovery procedure is activated, which will becarried out on the basis of the information specified in the directoryDIR. The system recovery procedure is completed once the prescribedsequence of steps, described hereinbefore, is carried out for eachcounterpart system.

The task recovery service TSR is invoked: for each UOW in the matrix, atask recovery procedure is activated; the task recovery procedure ishowever postponed to the time when the counterpart systems involved inthe UOW reach the state BACKOUT (if the UOW also involves EROBRs) or thestate READY (if the UOW involves IROBRs).

The task recovery service TSR is exploited for re-activating the tasksstill pending; the task recovery procedure carried out by the taskrecovery service enables the business request manager BRM identifying,on the basis of the information stored in the archive of the log serviceLOG, PCBRs still not completed, which need to be re-activated.

The transaction manager TM can be started up in either one of two modes,conventionally referred to as warm or cold. In the cold mode,differently from the warm mode, the tasks still pending after theprevious system shut-down are not handled, and thus not compensated; theC-SYS BACKOUT step of the system recovery procedure is not executed inrespect of the EROBRs.

In case of a warm start-up, the business request manager BRMre-activates PCBRs still not completed or queued (delayed) at a previoussystem shut-down. The extended resource manager ERM manages OBRs thatwere still not completed or resolved (i.e, in-doubt) at the systemshut-down.

Once the system recovery procedure is completed, the system SYS and thecounterpart systems C-SYS1, C-SYS2 are synchronised, and the pendingbusiness requests can be re-issued, as well as new business requests canbe accepted.

At the shut-down of the system SYS, the transaction manager TM notifiesthe shutting down to the business request manager BRM and the extendedresource manager ERM. The business request manager BRM and the extendedresource manager ERM can either reject a new service request or put itin the queue managed by the business request protection service BRPS; ifthe new business request is a PCBR, it is accepted, put in the businessrequest queue and serviced as soon as possible; if the business requestis an NPCBR, it is rejected.

The business request manager BRM waits for the transaction underprocessing to be completed. The extended resource manager ERM waits forthe completion of possible compensation activities relating to the UOWspreviously in error or backed out.

If the timeout in the directory DIR for the counterpart system lapses,or in case of a forced shut-down of the system SYS, and either thetransaction under processing or the compensation activities of the UOWspreviously in error or backed out cannot be completed, at the nextstart-up of the system SYS the system recovery procedure and the taskrecovery procedure are re-executed, so that business request manager BRMand the extended resource manager ERM can restart the PCBRs and thepending UOWs (provided that the transaction manager TM is restarted inthe warm mode).

During the system SYS operation, it the extended resource manager ERMdoes not obtain and store in the log archive the reply/outcome messagegenerated by a generic OBR, an in-doubt situation is established.Preliminary to any other activity, in-doubt situations are to beresolved. In order to retrieve the information relating to theactivation and completion of every OBR resulting in-doubt, the extendedresource manager ERM activates the connector associated with the OBR(specified in the directory DIR).

In particular the extended resource manager ERM, exploiting theidentifier code of the OBR, carries on the following inspection.

Firstly, the extended resource manager ascertains that the OBR has beenactivated; in the negative case (for example, as a consequence of theabove-mentioned queueing mechanisms), the OBR is considered notexecuted, and the activation message (if any) is deleted. The in-doubtsituation is thus resolved, enabling the system to perform thecompensation activities, if necessary; should the in-doubt OBR be theonly OBR within an EXT-UOW, the compensation activity would not even benecessary.

If it is instead ascertained that the OBR has been activated, theextended resource manager ascertains whether the OBR is still inexecution; this may occur when the primary task, that issued the OBR,must respect a timeout. In this case, it is possible to wait for thecompletion of the OBR and the acquisition of the reply message/outcome,or the OBR can be aborted and declared in error, so as to cancel theresults of the OBR in the backout phase. The in-doubt situation is thusresolved, enabling the system to perform the compensation activities,which are required in the case the OBR forcedly aborted usednon-recoverable resources.

In case the extended resource manager waits for the completion of theOBR, the logical outcome thereof is verified. The OBR replymessage/outcome may or may not be available, depending on the nature ofthe protocol adopted for the activation of the OBR. The acquisition ofthe reply message/outcome is useful for simplifying the determination ofthe compensation activities.

If the reply message/outcome is missing, although the OBR formallyresults correctly executed, there is no information on the processinglogical outcome and on how the processing has been classified by thecounterpart system; this information is typically included in the replymessage. The acquisition of the reply message/outcome allows determiningthe logical outcome of the service request, on the basis of anapplication or infrastructural internal coding, directly interpreted bythe involved connector or by the XBR. On the basis of the outcome, itcan be established whether the OBR produced the expected result, andthus a compensation phase is required, or no compensation activity isrequired in the event of a failure or a backout request.

If the reply message/outcome cannot be acquired, the OBR isautomatically submitted to compensation, or the system recoveryprocedure is started.

If the OBR is aborted, and only recoverable resources where involved, acompensation phase is not required. Differently, if the OBR usednon-recoverable resources, the in-doubt situation is only partiallyresolved, because changes (even partial) operated by the OBR may exist.The compensation phase, necessary in this case, can be preceded by apreliminary verify of what partially done by the OBR before beingaborted. This situation is notified by the extended resource managerupon activation of the connector associated with the XOBR.

An indirect support to the resolution of the in-doubt situations can beobtained by the activation of the system recovery procedure, whichincludes the preliminary C-SYS SIGN-ON step and the final C-SYS VERIFYstep, during which it is possible to handle, for each counterpartsystem, re-alignments between the counterpart system and the system SYS.In this way, the identifier codes of the OBRs directed to thatcounterpart system are acquired/negotiated; exploiting theacquired/negotiated identifier codes, it is possible to acquire from thecounterpart system information on the last operations directedthereto/completed, and thus automatically solve in-doubt cases on thebasis of the information retrieved from the counterpart system.

In case the in-doubt situation cannot be resolved automatically, ageneric user/system manager may be directly involved who, after havingcarried out the necessary checks, provides indications on how eachin-doubt situation is to be treated by the system, that is: the in-doubtsituation is to be considered resolved because the OBR does not resultexecuted, and no compensation is required, or the in-doubt situation isto be considered resolved because the OBR results even only partiallyexecuted, and requires compensation.

Even though the way an in-doubt situation is resolved is common to thedifferent types of OBRs, the different nature of each OBR affects thesystem behavior in the successive compensation phase (if such a phase isrequired). After having ascertained the execution of the OBR and theoutcome thereof, the compensation actions are the following:

NROBRS: these OBRs, generally associated with inquiry service requests,are not submitted to any compensation action. The resolution of possiblein-doubt situations is optional; it may be useful for verifying thecorrect operation of the whole system, but the check of the OBRexecution and, if available, the acquisition of the replymessage/outcome do not trigger any successive elaboration.

IROERS: these OBRs are associated with both inquiry and modify servicerequests; in this latter case the resolution of possible in-doubtsituations is mandatory. No direct compensation action is undertaken.The re-elaboration, triggered by possible re-elaboration of the businessrequest that issued the OBR, involves the acquisition of everythinglogged by the extended resource manager during the phase of acquisitionof the reply message/outcome, or the direct activation of the OBR,directed to the re-elaboration thereof by the counterpart system, andthe management of the reply message/outcome of such re-elaboration.

EROBRS: these OBRs normally involve changes to the resources. Theresolution of possible in-doubt situations is mandatory. Thecompensation activity consists in the direct activation of theassociated XOBR, or the activation of the associated XBR.

XOBRs: these OBRs are issued by the involved XBR, and are treated by thesystem like IROBRs. The resolution of possible in-doubt situations ismandatory. Errors produced during the execution of an XOBR areimplicitly compensated by the extended resource manager ERM, or theinterruption in the elaboration flow of the XOBR or of the XBR isautomatically handled and re-activated by the extended resource managerERM. The XOBRs that were previously terminated successfully areconsidered executed, while the respective reply messages/outcome areused for determining the successive compensation actions. Thenon-executed XOBRs are re-activated, so that the counterpart system canelaborate them and produce the expected reply message/outcome. Theactivation of an XBR is accompanied by the notification of the OBRs tobe compensated and of what previously requested/executed, together withthe related reply messages/outcomes. The XBR may proceed to thecompensation phase through the direct or postponed execution of specificactivities directed towards archives or processes.

A correct managing of EXT-UOWs requires system resource assignmentcriteria different from those adopted in conventional transactionmanagement systems.

In order to reduce the problems of integrity in the case of EXT-UOWs,the connectivity service CNCT implements a queueing of activities,directed to serializing the logical resources from time to time definedat the level of each task. Depending on the type of queueing and on theduration thereof, a task can acquire the control of the resourceslogically related thereto and keep such a control until the task iscompleted or, if it is case, the compensation phase is completed.

In particular, the business request manager and the extended resourcemanager allow defining logical entities and manages the access thereto.Each logical entity, once defined, can be acquired by one or more tasks,on the basis of the type of access requested by each task. Depending onthe type of logical entity and on the type of access requested, thefollowing exclusive/non-exclusive rights of use (LOCK) can be assignedto the tasks:

exclusive access right assigned to a task, and queueing of the othertasks; the queueing is for example of the first-in-first-out” (FIFO)type;

exclusive access right in modify assigned to a task, with read accessright assigned to other tasks, and queueing (e.g., FIFO) of any othertask requesting changes.

The time of validity of each LOCK may change depending on the type oflogical entity and the nature of the task requesting the service. Inparticular, the following time windows are provided for:

TASK time window: the right of use of a logical entity by a task remainsactive from the time the request is issued until the end of the task;

UOW time window: active from the time the request is issued until thecompletion of a specific UOW;

EXT-UOW time window: active from the time the request is issued untilthe completion of all the involved UOWs, including the possiblecompensation phase. It is worth pointing out that the extended resourcemanager ERM is able to correlate UOWs composing an EXT-UOW implementedby the system during the processing of a business request, even if eachUOW is known by the transaction manager TX and the resource managercoordinator RMC as a UOW compliant to the single- or two-phase commitprotocol, but the different UOWs are not directly correlated;

SYSTEM time window: active from the time the request is issued until thedetected availability of a specific remote system, including thecompletion of all the possible compensation activities directed to sucha system;

GENERIC time window: active from the time the request is issued until anexplicit command of de-queueing is issued.

An example of the operation of the transaction processing system isschematically depicted in FIG. 7. Let it be assumed that the transactionmanager TX receives a business request BR, listed in the catalog as aclassified business request CBR. A task T1 for servicing the businessrequest is activated, involving a UOW UOW1. During the processing of thetask T1, an OBR OBR1 is first issued, directed to one of the counterpartsystems C-SYS1, C-SYS2; a task T2 for servicing the OBR OBR1 isactivated in the counterpart system, involving a unit of work UOW2. Whenthe task T2 terminates successfully, the UOW UOW2 is committed. The taskTi then issues a second OBR OBR2, directed to either the same or anothercounterpart system. A task T3 is started in that counterpart system,processing the service request within a UOW UOW3. When the task T3 issuccessfully completed, the UOW UOW3 is committed. Let it be assumedthat, at this time, a backout request of the still in-flight UOW UOW1 isreceived by the resource manager coordinator RMC. The resource managercoordinator RMC invokes the extended resource manager ERM, which willmanage the backout or compensation activities for bringing the systemback to the initial state, if possible, or bringing the system toanother coherent state. Let it also be assumed that the business requestreceived by the transaction manager TM has an associated XBR XBR in thecatalog. The XBR XBR is invoked, causing a task T4 to be activated,associated with a UOW UOW4. In order to carry out the compensation ofthe UOWs UOW2 and UOW3, the actions previously performed are carried outin the inverse sequence. XOBRs OBR-2 and OBR-1 are issued in sequence,causing the activation of respective tasks T5 and T6 in the counterpartsystems; processing of the tasks T5 and T6 involves compensation UOWsXUOW5 and XUOW6. When both the tasks T5 and T6 are successfullycompleted, and the UOWs XUOW5 and XUOW6 are thus committed; the UOWsUOW2 and UOW3 have been compensated (any error condition raised in thisphase forces the interruption of the compensation phase, the waitingtask T1 can be positively postponed, or notified of the event orabended. Only the compensation activity will be postponed, a new XBRwill be instantiated and the failing XOBR started, being treated by thesystem like an IROBR). The UOW UOW1, up to now still in-flight, has thusbeen backed out, and is terminated.

The task T1 goes on processing the business request BR, and a new UOWUOW7 is entered. During the UOW UOW7, a new OBR OBR3 is then issued bythe task T1, directed to one of the counterpart systems; a task T7 islaunched in that counterpart system for servicing the OBR OBR7 within aUOW UOW8. When the task T7 is successfully terminated, the UOWs UOW8 andUOW7 are committed. The business request BR has thus been serviced, anda reply message is returned to the application that issued the businessrequest BR.

In summary, the present invention provides a method and a system fordeveloping and managing new business processes, compliant to acommit/backout protocol, allowing to exploit already existing processesindividually compliant or not compliant to the commit/backout protocol.In particular, in the development of a new business process, thecomponents of the new business process should be identified (businessrequest, OBR, XBR, XOBR and connector). The business logic should beplaced at the level of the business request; the compensation businesslogic (if specified) should be placed at the level of the XBR orconnector; the integration logic should be placed at the level of theconnector; alternatively, it is to be spread at the level of the XBR andbusiness request; data parsing should be placed at the level of thebusiness request or, if not possible, at the level of the connector; thecommunication outcome at the network infrastructure level should behandled by the connector; and the logical outcome of a business requestshould be generated by the business request, by the XBR, or by theconnector.

Although the present invention has been disclosed by way of someembodiments, it is apparent to those skilled in the art that severalmodifications to the described embodiments, as well as other embodimentsof the present invention are possible, without departing from the scopethereof as defined in the appended claims.

1. A data processing system for managing transactions, comprising: atleast one resource manager (RM) for managing changes to respectivesystem resources in accordance to a commit/backout protocol; a resourcemanager coordinator (RMC) for coordinating commit-backout activities ofthe at least one resource manager; and at least one process resourcemanager (ERM), working in accordance to a commit/backout protocol, formanaging an execution and the compensation of non-compliant processesnot complying to the commit/backout protocol compensation services ofthe at least one process resource manager (ERM) being coordinated by theresource manager coordinator according to the commit/backout protocol,the at least one process resource manager (ERM) determining, uponreceipt of a backout request resulting from the execution of thenon-compliant processes, compensation actions to be performed totransform the system resources into a mutually consistent state thatdiffers from an initially consistent state of the system resources thatexisted prior to the execution of the non-compliant processes.
 2. Thedata processing system of claim 1, wherein changes to the systemresources resulting from the execution of the non-compliant processestransform the system resources into a mutually inconsistent state. 3.The data processing system of claim 2, wherein the changes to the systemresources resulting from the execution of the non-compliant processescannot be backed out to transform the system resources from the mutuallyinconsistent state to the initially consistent state.
 4. (canceled) 5.The data processing system of claim 1, process resource manager managesthe execution of the non-compliant processes and execution of thecompensation actions by means of at least one task, and wherein the atleast one task is associated with a plurality of correlated units ofwork.
 6. The data processing system of claim 1, further comprising aninformation recording service for recording information concerning thecompensation actions performed during the execution of the non-compliantprocesses, the process resource manager determining the compensationactions on the basis of the information recorded by the informationrecording service. 7-8. (canceled)
 9. The data processing system ofclaim 6, further comprising a classification service that classifiesprocesses to be executed into process types and includes a processcatalog that comprises the process types and, for the process types inthe catalog, the classification service further includes information forenabling the process resource manager to determine the compensationactions on the basis of the information recorded by the informationrecording service. 10-11. (canceled)
 12. The data processing system ofclaim 6, further comprising an error recovery service implementing anerror recovery procedure for managing error conditions occurring duringthe execution of a process, wherein the error recovery procedure dependson the information recorded by the information recording service. 13-14.(canceled)
 15. The data processing system of claim 1, the non-compliantprocesses comprise a non-compliant process running on a counterpartprocessing system, and wherein a labile link exists between the dataprocessing system and the counterpart system.
 16. The data processingsystem of claim 15, further comprising a system recovery service (SYSR)implementing a system recovery procedure for establishing a synchronicpoint between the data processing system and the counterpart processingsystem. 17-18. (canceled)
 19. The data processing system of claim 16,wherein the system recovery procedure includes a negotiation phasebetween the data processing system and the counterpart processingsystem, said negotiation phase comprising negotiating identificationinformation of the processes directed to the counterpart processingsystem.
 20. The data processing system of claim 15, further comprising aconnectivity service (CNCT) exploited by the process resource managerfor managing communication between the data processing system and thecounterpart processing system. 21-22. (canceled)
 23. The data processingsystem of claim 1, wherein the at least one process resource manager(ERM) is also for managing an execution and compensation of compliantprocesses complying to the commit/backout protocol, wherein theinitially consistent state of the system resources existed prior to theexecution of the compliant processes, wherein changes to the systemresources resulting from the execution of the compliant processestransform the system resources into a state of inconsistency, andwherein the at least one process resource manager (ERM) determines, uponreceipt of a backout request resulting from the execution of thecompliant processes additional compensation actions to be performed totransform the system resources from the state of inconsistency to theinitially consistent state.
 24. (canceled)
 25. A data processing methodfor managing transactions, comprising: providing at least one resourcemanager (RM) for managing changes to respective system resources inaccordance to a commit/backout protocol; providing a resource managercoordinator (RMC) for coordinating commit-backout activities of the atleast one resource manager; providing at least one process resourcemanager (ERM), working in accordance to a commit/backout protocol, formanaging an execution and compensation of non-compliant processes notcomplying to the commit/backout protocol, said resource managercoordinator (RMC) being adapted to coordinate compensation services ofthe at least one process resource manager (ERM) according to thecommit/backout protocol; determining by the at least one processresource manager (ERM), upon receipt of a backout request resulting fromthe execution of the non-compliant processes, compensation actions totransform the system resources into a mutually consistent state thatdiffers from an initially consistent state of the system resources thatexisted prior to the execution of the non-compliant processes; andperforming the compensation actions.
 26. The method of claim 25, whereinchanges to the system resources resulting from the execution of thenon-compliant processes transform the system resources into a mutuallyinconsistent state.
 27. The method of claim 26, wherein the changes tothe system resources resulting from the execution of the non-compliantprocesses cannot be backed out to transform the system resources fromthe mutually inconsistent state to the initially consistent state. 28.The method of claim 25, further comprising: managing, by the processresource manager, the execution of the non-compliant processes; andexecuting the compensation actions including executing at least onetask, wherein the at least one task is associated with a plurality ofcorrelated units of work.
 29. The method of claim 25, furthercomprising: recording information, by an information recording service,concerning the compensation actions performed during the execution ofthe non-compliant processes; and determining, by the process resourcemanager, the compensation actions on the basis of the informationrecorded by the information recording service.
 30. The method of claim29, further comprising classifying, by a classification service,processes to be executed into process types, wherein the classificationservice includes a process catalog that includes the process types and,for the process types in the catalog, the classification service furtherincludes information for enabling the process resource manager toautomatically determine the compensation actions on the basis of theinformation recorded by the information recording service.
 31. Themethod of claim 29, further comprising implementing, by an errorrecovery service, an error recovery procedure for managing errorconditions occurring during the execution of a process, wherein theerror recovery procedure depends on the information recorded by theinformation recording service.
 32. The method of claim 25, wherein thenon-compliant processes comprise a non-compliant process running on acounterpart processing system, and wherein a labile link exists betweenthe data processing system and the counterpart system.
 33. The method ofclaim 32, further comprising providing a system recovery service (SYSR)implementing a system recovery procedure for establishing a synchronicpoint between the data processing system and the counterpart processingsystem.
 34. The method of claim 33, wherein the system recoveryprocedure includes a negotiation phase between the data processingsystem and the at least one distinct data counterpart processing system,said negotiation phase comprising negotiating identification informationof the processes directed to the counterpart processing system.
 35. Themethod of claim 32, further comprising providing a connectivity service(CNCT) exploited by the process resource manager for managingcommunication between the data processing system and the counterpartprocessing system.
 36. The method of claim 25,;wherein the at least oneprocess resource manager (ERM) is also for managing an execution andcompensation of compliant processes complying to the commit/backoutprotocol, wherein the initially consistent state of the system resourcesexisted prior to the execution of the compliant processes, whereinchanges to the system resources resulting from the execution of thecompliant processes transform the system resources into a state ofinconsistency, and wherein the method further comprises: determining bythe at least one process resource manager (ERM), upon receipt of abackout request resulting from the execution of the compliant processes,additional compensation actions to transform the system resources fromthe state of inconsistency to the initially consistent state; andperforming the additional compensation actions.